Hands Off My Healthcare!

Dan digs up some hidden requirements of Obamacare

With the Supreme Court gathering this week to consider the constitutionality of the individual mandate and several other  problems with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act - otherwise known as Obamacare - I thought it a good opportunity to share the results of some of my own research into this controversial law.


As you may be aware, the legislation was designed to cover up the real cost in order to encourage individual congressmen to vote for it.  The administration has issued thousands of waivers to big businesses and unions, the non-partisan congressional budget office recently revised its forecasted cost by nearly doubling the original estimate and while the individual mandate is, this week, making its way to the Supreme Court, it was recently revealed that implementing the law will require religious organizations in the United States to choose between compliance and their core beliefs.  These should all be signals to intelligent people that the law over reached… something...


Nancy Pelosi really meant it when she said "you have to pass the bill so you can read it."  The good news just keeps on coming!


Stimulated by the idea that now two years later we are still learning more about Obamacare, I picked it up myself and did a little research.


Did you know that by 2016 all Americans will be required to eat broccoli three times a week and take vitamins?  Of course the term "vitamins" is yet to be defined, but I'm sure that this will in no way be as objectionable as the government defining for us the appropriate coverage that must be included in an insurance plan.


I found the broccoli thing a little odd so I called a friend of mine who works as a committee staffer on the Hill.  She confirmed my understanding and explained the rationale behind this requirement (and there are, of course other items on the "must eat" list) is driven by the fact that the government is now financially responsible for our health care and eating right unquestionably can lower the overall cost of healthcare, therefore,  it is in our best interest as taxpayers to eat broccoli.  


By 2018 when the economics of the law unquestionably turns upside down on us - notably after Barack Obama's retirement in any circumstance - there is another provision that will provide for a government subsidy for your gym membership if you can't afford it yourself.  Of course it is yet to be defined by the government what qualifies as your ability to "afford" it and how this will be implemented -whether  you can simply submit evidence of payment or, at the other end of the spectrum, potentially submit your workout diary or trainer's statement - but nevertheless it is there.  Taxpayers will be subsidizing gym membership in order to achieve it's higher moral purpose of making everyone better off.


So I ask you, dear readers, are you ok with this level of involvement of the US Federal Government in your personal life?  Are you ok paying taxes (or inflated insurance premiums) to subsidize other people's lifestyle choices?  Frankly, I'm not.  I'm joining the protest tomorrow [Tuesday March 27] in front of the Supreme Court to tell the government to keep its Hands Off My Healthcare.  Why don't you come down and join us?



This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

art slesinger March 26, 2012 at 09:22 PM
Well we started with aa real problem and created more of the same. Every other develped country has figured out a way that some poor citizen with a serious disease does not have to lose their home to pay for treatment. We are one of the few civillzed places where you have to make a choice between medical treatment and owning your home. Totally inappropriate. So that is what we needed to solve, What we got is a whale instead of one small race horse. Why could they not have simply allowed Medicare to engage all citizens whose medical cost exceed $50,000 over a 3 year period? (all #s are open to debate)
David Drake March 29, 2012 at 11:44 PM
Dan What's the problem I love broccoli!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dave
Cathy Kelleher March 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM
Dan, Sadly, most Americans don's see the healtcare bill for what it really is. It isn't even well disguised! Right about now I am sure the gov't is getting their broccoli seeds ready to plant on gov't land that should be used for drilling oil. EPA is drooling over this! As government gets bigger and bigger the meaning of our lives will get smaller and smaller until we are insignificant. Just a cog in a wheel. Remember the movie "Soylent Green"? It was an unbelievable movie when I first saw it. Now it is believable! As far as "every citizen" having healthcare...."Fathom the Hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen."----- ---- Ben Stein Cathy Kelleher
Daniel Grossberg March 30, 2012 at 06:43 PM
Wow! I never thought of it that way...I'm going to send that out on Twitter if that's ok with you. Please follow me there too. Thanks for your thoughts Cathy and more importantly all your hard work! https://twitter.com/#!/DanGrossberg


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »